Proposed legislation to remove sexual abuse in Indonesia has made headlines in recent months due to outspoken opposition to the invoice out of Islamic conservatives. They assert it market free sexual and deviant sexual behavior.
The political parties of the President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo along with his rival, Prabowo Subianto, support the laws. A change request behind the anti-sexual violence bill now has more than 217,000 signatures. At exactly the exact same time, a rival petition opposing the invoice has accumulated near 162,000 signatures because late January.
The bill intends to prohibit and prevent sexual abuse such as rape, forced prostitution, sexual slavery and sexual desire at the family, office and in public.
The most recent figures from UNFPA imply more than one in three female girls between the ages of 15 and 64 have undergone sexual and physical abuse within their lifetime. The true amount of sexual abuse victims is probably much higher as more than 90 percent of rape cases in Indonesia are anticipated to go unreported.
Fears Over ‘Free Sex’ Are Misplaced
Among PKS’s major arguments against the anti-sexual violence bill is the fact that it criminalises rape, including marital rape, but doesn’t explicitly prohibit consensual, same-sex relationships outside marriage.
PKS asserts that by not specifically addressing premarital sexual intercourse, the invoice indirectly promotes “free sex” and homosexuality. However, there are great reasons why the bill doesn’t explicitly deal with these difficulties.
To begin with, the purpose of the bill is restricted to eliminating sexual violence. Non violent sexual relations fall beyond the reach of the invoice and aren’t pertinent to this particular legislation. Secondly, the legality of premarital connections has been debated and legislated at a contentious draft of this amendment to the criminal code.
As other laws addresses premarital connections, it’s not necessary or suitable to the anti-sexual violence invoice to include such terms. Challenging the invoice on the grounds that it doesn’t discuss consensual, non-violent premarital relations is therefore lost.
National commission on violence against women (Komnas Perempuan) Commissioner Azriana stated in an interview with the writers that the ”topics of free sex and homosexuality would be the unilateral interpretation from classes that deny the invoice without interfering together with people who resisted it”.
Conservative opposition to the anti-sexual violence invoice isn’t a new phenomenon. On the other hand, the time of PKS increasing the problem is apparently an effort to garner votes going to elections in April.
It’s the first time Indonesia’s presidential and parliamentary elections will be held in exactly the exact same moment. Islamic parties have historically performed badly in the ballot box. Its picture tainted by a string of corruption scandals, PKS won only 6.79 percent of their vote from the 2014 presidential elections. This represented a swing of 1.09% from the party, which dropped 17 chairs.
Lacklustre electoral results have observed Indonesian Islamic parties such as PKS turn their focus to some political agenda focusing on conservative “morality” problems. Rejection of this anti-sexual violence invoice echoes PKS complaint of this Anti domestic Violence Law, which was passed in 2004.
The celebration also rejected exemptions married rape. That exact same year, the then deputy leader of PKS, Hilman Rosyad Syihab, defended kid marriage, saying that Islam permitted for union no matter if or not a woman has attained sexual maturity.
PKS politicians also have been in the forefront of proposing terms to criminalise premarital connections in the draft criminal code. While discussion of the legislation has mostly targeted banning sexual relationships within LGBTQ communities, the terms within their existing form also undermine the wider community.
They assert that the draft may put millions of Indonesians in danger of prosecution. The anti-sexual violence invoice isn’t about premarital sex or homosexuality. It’s around the prohibition and prevention of sexual abuse against Indonesian men, women and kids.
Significantly, the bill includes comprehensive provisions for its security and assistance of victims of sexual violence. This includes supplying health services and legal aid for victims. All these long overdue reforms are essential to protect vulnerable members of society.